New mindsets and methodologies needed to be introduced, and whole new sets of technology needed to be created to operate and manage the service in a connected global environment. Monitoring a set of services at the scale of Microsoft 365 is very challenging. So what you have is a vendor making a product that they know nothing about.Given the scale of Microsoft 365, it would be impossible to keep customer data resilient and safe from malware without built-in monitoring that is comprehensive, alerting that is intelligent, and self-healing that is fast and reliable. But Sangoma who builds on top of Asterisk definitely doesn't agree here either. So this is someone building on top of Digium's work, like Sangoma. Although the only company that "makes" Asterisk is Digium and they would definitely never say something so crazy. Vendors "make" the products, resellers (VARs) sell them next down the line. Its not a vendor, they are the company that developed the phone system, just like 3CX.3CX is a vendor. Its not a vendor, they are the company that developed the phone system, just like 3CX. These are REALLY basic mistakes for your vendor to make. So basically, these guys don't know Asterisk, phones or virtualization yet you pay them for systems that they aren't knowledgable on? Why do you use them if they don't' know anything about phones or their own platform? That makes no sense. For these reasons, we do not recommend using virtualization. Overall, the use of virtualization adds more complexity, creates new problems and reduces the stability
#Open source raid monitor how to#
How to obtain data from another virtual machine running on the same hardware given specific There are several published exploits that show
These systems also required a greater degree ofįine tuning and timing of the crontab entries on each container in order to get everything workingĪn added issue with virtualization is security-related. Maintenance issues compared to dedicated hardware. They ended up discontinuing their use of it after a couple years due to lower reliability and higher Get out of a dedicated system, there is always loss of functional capacity when you virtualize in anyĪt clients that have used OpenVZ for containerized (phone system) systems in production a few years ago, Also, you never get the capacity out of a shared system that you will There is an additionalĬomplication with Asterisk, in that the timer used to synchronize audio often becomes very unreliable,Īs for containers, the problem is always with balancing and controlling resource allocation across all of When there are multiple virtual servers running on the same piece of hardware. This causes issues with resource allocation, especially
#Open source raid monitor install#
Install and the hardware it is installed upon. When you virtualize, you add another layer of the operating system between the functional Linux We do not recommend using any Linux virtualization within a (phone system name). We also will not be able to get support from the company that developed the phone system if we virtualize because they strongly discourage virtualization and will not provide support to anyone running it on VMs.īefore we get into a discussion on hardware, we want to discuss use of virtual machines andĬontainerized Linux. We have virtualized 3CX PBX servers, but our asterisks phone system is the one that runs into issues. Someone really is confused about what the real issue is and blamed something that can't possibly be the issue. We've been doing PBX VMs since 2004 and it wasn't new then. Phones systems should definitely always be virtual. Applications are not "developed" to work or not work on virtualization, virtualization and applications do not interact. Time sync issues woudl just mean that the OS and/or VM wasn't set up properly. We ran into a lot of time sync issues which affected call quality, so we fired up 20 bare metal servers. Lahimakonem wrote:These are phone system servers and at this point, they havent developed it enough to run on VMs.
0 kommentar(er)
